Android and Apple tablets (Research Paper) - 3850 Words

A comparison of Android and Apple tablets use in Law Enforcement (Research Paper Sample) Content: Recommendation ReportName:Institution:Table of Contents TOC \o "1-3" \h \z \u Transmittal Memorandum PAGEREF _Toc379728168 \h 3Executive Summary PAGEREF _Toc379728169 \h 4Recommendation Report PAGEREF _Toc379728170 \h 5Introduction PAGEREF _Toc379728171 \h 5Methodology PAGEREF _Toc379728172 \h 5Literature Review PAGEREF _Toc379728173 \h 5History and Development of Tablets PAGEREF _Toc379728174 \h 5Attitude and Use of Tablets PAGEREF _Toc379728175 \h 9Comparison of Apple and Android Tablets PAGEREF _Toc379728176 \h 10Rugged Tablets PAGEREF _Toc379728177 \h 10Technical Difficulties PAGEREF _Toc379728178 \h 11Analysis and Discussion PAGEREF _Toc379728179 \h 11Conclusion PAGEREF _Toc379728180 \h 12Recommendation PAGEREF _Toc379728181 \h 13References PAGEREF _Toc379728182 \h 14Transmittal MemorandumDate:To: []From: []Re: A COMPARISON OF ANDROID AND APPLE TABLETSà ¢Ã¢â€š ¬ USE IN THE LAW ENFORCEMENT.Enclosed is "A comparison of Android and Appleà ¢Ã¢â€š ¬ tablets use in L aw Enforcement: A Recommendation Report." This report encompasses a recommendation for use of Android tablet in the Law enforcement.As you have conveyed your pledge to investing into tablet use in your police work, I hope you will wisely contemplate this recommendation. This report compares and examines use of Android and Apple tablets in Law enforcement. The history of tablets is discussed. The uses and the attitudes of the law enforcement towards tabletsà ¢Ã¢â€š ¬ use are discussed too. I obtained the information in this report from scholarly articles.I hope the report will offer all the facts you require to assess and determine which type tablet is the best to use in the law enforcement. Kindly inform me if any questions emerge about this report.YoursName(Signature)Executive SummaryThe greatest and most significant challenges facing the law enforcement are the necessity to select the range of new technologies, which have kicked in the scene during recent years. Technologies can render policing more effective; however, technology costs money and time to acquire, plus there are many dissimilar technologies to select. Are license-plate readers effectual in solving or preventing auto thefts plus other misconducts? Do surveillance-cameras provide value for oneà ¢Ã¢â€š ¬s money? Should technology bucks be spent strengthening computer systems, which support projecting analytics? What about utilizing Social Medias to cultivate collaborations with community groups and businesses to combat crime? What are the public rights consequences of these novel technologies for policing? It is apparent that these forms of queries will become especially crucial in the future as technology becomes more advanced and diversified. This report attempts to compare Android and Apple tabletà ¢Ã¢â€š ¬s use in law enforcement. The report recommends that, Android tablets are user friendly in terms of price, and its high video resolution makes a better choice for police line of work as p olice can use to gather evidence even at night. The report also recommends the rugged Android tablet as the appropriate tablet for law enforcement line of work.Recommendation ReportIntroductionTablet computers are portable PCs bigger than cell phones that come with flat touchscreens as their central external feature. Operation in tablets is mainly through tapping the screen through the usage of either fingers or a stylus. Typing words upon modern models can similarly be done by the usage of a simulated keyboard. Other models can be linked to keyboards via USB ports or wireless connections. The tablet PC market that only underwent full evolution with the technologyà ¢Ã¢â€š ¬s mass production during 2010 has been controlled by Appleà ¢Ã¢â€š ¬s iPad that operates on the iOS (operating system). Other key players within the industry comprise of Samsung, Microsoft, Amazon, HTC, Google, RIM, Sony, Motorola, HP, Asus, and Toshiba. These tablets utilize Googleà ¢Ã¢â€š ¬s Android, RIMà ¢Ã ¢â€š ¬s QNX, or Microsoftà ¢Ã¢â€š ¬s Windows as their OS (Hendrik, Gove Webb, 2012; Phillips, 2008; Casady, 2011). The tablets platformà ¢Ã¢â€š ¬s integral portability, magnified with increased processing power plus battery life, provides them a massive capacity to replace laptop computers and desktop PCs for both business and personal use. Technology certainly can perform an immense role in assisting police to reduce crime rates. For instance, the use of Comp-Stat, a management model for synthesizing crime data assessment, has been helpful in identifying problems and patterns of crimes. Comp-Stat could not have been feasible without correct, timely evidence concerning when and where misconducts are taking place and computers rendered it conceivable to collect crime data upon a daily or weekly basis. Police commanders have rendered it apparent that they are just starting to comprehend the influence, which technologies will have upon the policing effectiveness. Tablets can, theref ore, bring a considerable change in policing work through their high-tech features.MethodologyThis research report methodology entails assessing and summarizing already published scholarly, informative research articles.Literature ReviewThe literature will encompass a review of history and development of tablets, and a comparison of Apple and Android tablets.History and Development of TabletsMost contemporary users think that tablets PCs were developed when Apple, in the Steve Jobsà ¢Ã¢â€š ¬ leadership, introduced the iPad during 2010. Unknown by most people, tablets had previously been around for eras, with the origins of their evolution dating as earlier as the 1800 century (Hendrik, Gove Webb, 2012).Pre-1950: OriginsDuring 1888, Gray Elisha was permitted a Teleautograph patent, an electrical technology for capturing handwriting. Succeeding copyrights for a user-interface, which identified handwriting along with a touchscreen for inputting the handwriting, were accorded correspo ndingly in 1915 as well as 1942. The three innovations are deemed the fundamental technologies, which established the beginnings of what became a developed industry over an era later on (Phillips, 2008).1950s-1980s: Taking ShapeUsers of tablet PCs are now aware with what started to develop in the 1950s-1960s. Science fiction TV shows plus popular movies during the à ¢Ã¢â€š ¬Ã‹Å"60s, most particularly 2001: A Space Odyssey" and "Star Trek" had a momentous influence upon how tablets were hypothesized and created. In Star Trek movie, crew associates were viewed carrying automated clipboards, which were operated through a stylus. In the meantime, 2001: A Space Odyssey displayed a flat-screen tablet with the capacity to play a transmitted video wirelessly (Hendrik, Gove Webb, 2012). Nevertheless, the realism during that period was that existing tablets were shaped as computer terminals linked to headset pads, which received electrical inputting from a stylus. The tablets were considera bly far from movable since they were excessively heavy. Moreover, they were extremely costly. From these initial models, it undertook years for tablet PCs to turn into more compact models armed with more utilities. More particularly, the evolution of the tablet PCs features and functions spread across diverse devices, each going through multiple versions.In the tablet PC history, two technologies are recognized as the originators in the development of its inputting system. They were the RAND and Styalator tablet, both that were launched to during the early à ¢Ã¢â€š ¬Ã‹Å"60s (Phillips, 2008). Both were automated tablets armed with software, which permitted real time detection of handwritten script inscribed via a specialized pen for inputting onto the tab. During 1968, Kay Alan created the Dynabook that is now recognized as the design for numerous movable computing technologies such as tablet PCs and laptops (Hendrik, Gove Webb, 2012). Years afterwards, in September, 1989, the lead ing commercially available movable tablet computer was introduced, known as GRiDPaD. The GRiDPaD was equipped with a backlit ten-inch gray-scale screen, which accepted a modem/fax card, stylus input, 3-hour battery life, an interior floppy drive, and it operated on MS-DOS.1990s: the PDAs developmentIn spite of the GRiDPad launch at the termination of the à ¢Ã¢â€š ¬Ã‹Å"80s, the ensuing years did not generate a flow of the same tablets accessible to the populace from other makers. Though various firms began creating their own kinds of portable PC devices, what evidenced most of the à ¢Ã¢â€š ¬Ã‹Å"90s was the evolution of the personal digital assistant (PDA) market (Hendrik, Gove Webb, 2012; Phillips, 2008; Casady, 2011). This era did not openly shape the evolution of tablet Computers, but rather saw the development of its lesser cousin, the personal digital assistant (Hendrik, Gove Webb, 2012).The era began with a rivalry among corporations upon which of their OS would take over th e market. GO Company, which established the PenPoint operating system, was later purchased by ATT. This OS ran the ATT EOà ¢Ã¢â€š ¬s Personal Communicator. Introduced in 1993, PDA device by ATT could email and send fax, and it was sold to business managers with an unrestricted ATT subscription. Alongside a $2,500 value tag, the technology had less public appeal and was stopped just a year following its establishment (Smart, 2012). Microsoft similarly created its own operating system for PDAs, viewing the PenPoint operating as a competition to their Windows-driven Computers. The company developed Pen Extensions for 3.1 Windows and introduced it as Pen Computing Windows. Its features encompassed a platform attuned with the stylus-input and an on-screen keyboard. Furthermore, the OS similarly enabled devices operating on it to reply to the operatorà ¢Ã¢â€š ¬s han...

Popes and Owens Diverging Views on War in Whos for the Game” and Dulce Et Decorum Est. - Literature Essay Samples

Jessie Pope and Wilfred Owen have both written poems about war, but each poet describes war from a different perspective. While Pope portrays war as a game in her poem, Owen illustrates the harsh realities of war by the use of diction and other poetic devices. Although, Jessie Pope uses rhyme in her poem to create a nursery rhyme style and she uses a positive vocabulary; it is in fact very ignorant of her to trivialize war. On the other hand, Wilfred Owen describes war in a fairly straightforward way, which indeed, makes the poem seem harsh and showcases the truth about war. In the poem, â€Å"Who’s for the game† Pope uses a lot of rhetorical questions, nursery rhyme, and positive vocabulary to produce trust and make the reader feel like a hero or a coward. For instance, when Pope says â€Å"who’ll give his country a hand?† it makes the reader sense the duty of helping their country. In the meanwhile, several game references have also been in support of the rhetorical questions. As noticeable, this is not only to make the poem enjoyable but also to make the reader feel glorious if they go to war. â€Å"Who’ll grip and tackle the job unafraid?† this is an allusion to Rugby and is followed by the word â€Å"job† which represents a certain obligation with a payment, in this case, it would be the pride. In addition â€Å"Unafraid† is used and it helps represent heroism. â€Å"Who’ll toe the line† This builds up desperation for going to war in the readers’ mind and showing who is bes t and who can win this competition of war. Later, juxtaposition is used â€Å"Who wants to turn himself in the show? And who wants a seat in the stand† so that the reader conceptualizes himself as a coward, giving an image that if he will be part of the crowd who cheers for actors and not the actor himself. Afterward, an internal rhyme is used â€Å"Who would much rather come back with a crutch.† which, in a mature opinion would be saying that â€Å"much† and â€Å"crutch† symbolize that most hurtful thing that can happen to a soldier is getting a broken leg. For the reader, a realistic poem is more satisfying than a one which is done for propaganda and is full of ignorance. So even if Pope has a fortifying poem, Owen’s poem will still be more likable because of the experience that can be felt in the poem. â€Å"Dulce Et Decorum Est.† Is a poem that is full of pause, metaphors, and similes and is written in a traumatic manner. The line â€Å"But limped on, blood-shod. All went lame, all blind.† shows the frequent use of caesura and its mix with metaphors. The caesura helps feel the pain of the soldiers, like someone dying a slow death â€Å"but limped on† this shows that even if the soldiers cannot walk anymore they have to keep going â€Å"blood-shod† with shoes filled with blood â€Å"All went lame, all blind† this shows that they are desensitized. This shows the reader that even if the poet is going through emotional trauma, on the outside he can’t feel anything. Later on, another comparison is made â€Å"like a devil sick of sin† this creates a sympathetic image in the readers mind because it represents that even if the soldiers have not done any sin, they have to go through such dreadful suffering. This poem can completely ruin the image of Pope in the readers’ mind because she was part of the cause for that suffering. In both the poems, thoughts about war have been represented distinguished way. The pain and suffering of the soldiers in the poem by Owen is portrayed very intensely â€Å"But someone was still yelling out and stumbling† leaving Goosebumps readers’ body. It develops hatred against Pope as it creates aural imagery which makes it even more forceful than what it is. Also shows how Pope is cold-hearted because being a woman she didn’t know how it felt to be at war. Moreover, this part of the poem also makes the reader feel afraid because of the visual and sound imagery the poet develops in the readers’ minds. Because of the imagery used by Owen the reader can image him/herself as Owen and feel the need of helping the person drowning. Finally, the trauma Owen went through is mentioned: â€Å"He plunges at me, guttering, choking, and drowning.† This helps the reader to feel sympathy towards Owen. Due to the experience used in his poem the reader is engage d and can relate to the poet. This makes the reader feel more attached to Owen than he can ever to Pope. In the last few lines of â€Å"Who’s for the game† Pope uses slang and shows war as a lady. â€Å"Come along, lads-† as if she were inviting someone to play a game, which is what Pope is trying to achieve. So, this quote would make the reader think positively about going to war. After a while, Pope personifies the country as a helpless lady, â€Å"Your country is up to her neck in a fight† This would be like saying â€Å"Your wife is drowning† to a husband, he would care for her and go to the rescue, which is what Pope wants all the young men to do, go to the rescue of their country. This is a very ignorant thing to do for Pope as she does not know what it feels like when a family member goes to war. However, the last stanza of â€Å"Dulce et Decorum est.†, Owen criticizes Pope completely using sarcastic tone, â€Å"My friend, you would not tell The old lie: Dulce et decorum est pro patri mori.† this shows how frustrated Owen feels because of Pope’s ignorance. As a result, the last line of the poem shows Owen’s abhorrence against war is visible. The last lines show how Owen blames Pope to send children to war telling them hideous and disgusting lies. Overall this kind of an end can leave hatred for Pope in the readers’ mind. Wanting them to talk to her about how irresponsible it is to trivialize war to something as simple as a game. Obviously, both Pope and Owen disagree with each other and defend their points of view. It is noticeable that the reader will be against war after reading Owens poetry. This is because of the applied tone, diction and other poetic devices in the poem. The reader might also think that there was immaturity and a lot of ignorance in considering the kind of rhyme adapted in Pope’s poem. Some readers may also believe that the trivialization of war in Pope’s poetry is offensive. Despite the fact that Pope’s poem is more entertaining than Owen’s. The reader might as well prefer Owen’s poem because of his sincerity in showing and laying out the ear-splitting realities of war.