Android and Apple tablets (Research Paper) - 3850 Words

A comparison of Android and Apple tablets use in Law Enforcement (Research Paper Sample) Content: Recommendation ReportName:Institution:Table of Contents TOC \o "1-3" \h \z \u Transmittal Memorandum PAGEREF _Toc379728168 \h 3Executive Summary PAGEREF _Toc379728169 \h 4Recommendation Report PAGEREF _Toc379728170 \h 5Introduction PAGEREF _Toc379728171 \h 5Methodology PAGEREF _Toc379728172 \h 5Literature Review PAGEREF _Toc379728173 \h 5History and Development of Tablets PAGEREF _Toc379728174 \h 5Attitude and Use of Tablets PAGEREF _Toc379728175 \h 9Comparison of Apple and Android Tablets PAGEREF _Toc379728176 \h 10Rugged Tablets PAGEREF _Toc379728177 \h 10Technical Difficulties PAGEREF _Toc379728178 \h 11Analysis and Discussion PAGEREF _Toc379728179 \h 11Conclusion PAGEREF _Toc379728180 \h 12Recommendation PAGEREF _Toc379728181 \h 13References PAGEREF _Toc379728182 \h 14Transmittal MemorandumDate:To: []From: []Re: A COMPARISON OF ANDROID AND APPLE TABLETSà ¢Ã¢â€š ¬ USE IN THE LAW ENFORCEMENT.Enclosed is "A comparison of Android and Appleà ¢Ã¢â€š ¬ tablets use in L aw Enforcement: A Recommendation Report." This report encompasses a recommendation for use of Android tablet in the Law enforcement.As you have conveyed your pledge to investing into tablet use in your police work, I hope you will wisely contemplate this recommendation. This report compares and examines use of Android and Apple tablets in Law enforcement. The history of tablets is discussed. The uses and the attitudes of the law enforcement towards tabletsà ¢Ã¢â€š ¬ use are discussed too. I obtained the information in this report from scholarly articles.I hope the report will offer all the facts you require to assess and determine which type tablet is the best to use in the law enforcement. Kindly inform me if any questions emerge about this report.YoursName(Signature)Executive SummaryThe greatest and most significant challenges facing the law enforcement are the necessity to select the range of new technologies, which have kicked in the scene during recent years. Technologies can render policing more effective; however, technology costs money and time to acquire, plus there are many dissimilar technologies to select. Are license-plate readers effectual in solving or preventing auto thefts plus other misconducts? Do surveillance-cameras provide value for oneà ¢Ã¢â€š ¬s money? Should technology bucks be spent strengthening computer systems, which support projecting analytics? What about utilizing Social Medias to cultivate collaborations with community groups and businesses to combat crime? What are the public rights consequences of these novel technologies for policing? It is apparent that these forms of queries will become especially crucial in the future as technology becomes more advanced and diversified. This report attempts to compare Android and Apple tabletà ¢Ã¢â€š ¬s use in law enforcement. The report recommends that, Android tablets are user friendly in terms of price, and its high video resolution makes a better choice for police line of work as p olice can use to gather evidence even at night. The report also recommends the rugged Android tablet as the appropriate tablet for law enforcement line of work.Recommendation ReportIntroductionTablet computers are portable PCs bigger than cell phones that come with flat touchscreens as their central external feature. Operation in tablets is mainly through tapping the screen through the usage of either fingers or a stylus. Typing words upon modern models can similarly be done by the usage of a simulated keyboard. Other models can be linked to keyboards via USB ports or wireless connections. The tablet PC market that only underwent full evolution with the technologyà ¢Ã¢â€š ¬s mass production during 2010 has been controlled by Appleà ¢Ã¢â€š ¬s iPad that operates on the iOS (operating system). Other key players within the industry comprise of Samsung, Microsoft, Amazon, HTC, Google, RIM, Sony, Motorola, HP, Asus, and Toshiba. These tablets utilize Googleà ¢Ã¢â€š ¬s Android, RIMà ¢Ã ¢â€š ¬s QNX, or Microsoftà ¢Ã¢â€š ¬s Windows as their OS (Hendrik, Gove Webb, 2012; Phillips, 2008; Casady, 2011). The tablets platformà ¢Ã¢â€š ¬s integral portability, magnified with increased processing power plus battery life, provides them a massive capacity to replace laptop computers and desktop PCs for both business and personal use. Technology certainly can perform an immense role in assisting police to reduce crime rates. For instance, the use of Comp-Stat, a management model for synthesizing crime data assessment, has been helpful in identifying problems and patterns of crimes. Comp-Stat could not have been feasible without correct, timely evidence concerning when and where misconducts are taking place and computers rendered it conceivable to collect crime data upon a daily or weekly basis. Police commanders have rendered it apparent that they are just starting to comprehend the influence, which technologies will have upon the policing effectiveness. Tablets can, theref ore, bring a considerable change in policing work through their high-tech features.MethodologyThis research report methodology entails assessing and summarizing already published scholarly, informative research articles.Literature ReviewThe literature will encompass a review of history and development of tablets, and a comparison of Apple and Android tablets.History and Development of TabletsMost contemporary users think that tablets PCs were developed when Apple, in the Steve Jobsà ¢Ã¢â€š ¬ leadership, introduced the iPad during 2010. Unknown by most people, tablets had previously been around for eras, with the origins of their evolution dating as earlier as the 1800 century (Hendrik, Gove Webb, 2012).Pre-1950: OriginsDuring 1888, Gray Elisha was permitted a Teleautograph patent, an electrical technology for capturing handwriting. Succeeding copyrights for a user-interface, which identified handwriting along with a touchscreen for inputting the handwriting, were accorded correspo ndingly in 1915 as well as 1942. The three innovations are deemed the fundamental technologies, which established the beginnings of what became a developed industry over an era later on (Phillips, 2008).1950s-1980s: Taking ShapeUsers of tablet PCs are now aware with what started to develop in the 1950s-1960s. Science fiction TV shows plus popular movies during the à ¢Ã¢â€š ¬Ã‹Å"60s, most particularly 2001: A Space Odyssey" and "Star Trek" had a momentous influence upon how tablets were hypothesized and created. In Star Trek movie, crew associates were viewed carrying automated clipboards, which were operated through a stylus. In the meantime, 2001: A Space Odyssey displayed a flat-screen tablet with the capacity to play a transmitted video wirelessly (Hendrik, Gove Webb, 2012). Nevertheless, the realism during that period was that existing tablets were shaped as computer terminals linked to headset pads, which received electrical inputting from a stylus. The tablets were considera bly far from movable since they were excessively heavy. Moreover, they were extremely costly. From these initial models, it undertook years for tablet PCs to turn into more compact models armed with more utilities. More particularly, the evolution of the tablet PCs features and functions spread across diverse devices, each going through multiple versions.In the tablet PC history, two technologies are recognized as the originators in the development of its inputting system. They were the RAND and Styalator tablet, both that were launched to during the early à ¢Ã¢â€š ¬Ã‹Å"60s (Phillips, 2008). Both were automated tablets armed with software, which permitted real time detection of handwritten script inscribed via a specialized pen for inputting onto the tab. During 1968, Kay Alan created the Dynabook that is now recognized as the design for numerous movable computing technologies such as tablet PCs and laptops (Hendrik, Gove Webb, 2012). Years afterwards, in September, 1989, the lead ing commercially available movable tablet computer was introduced, known as GRiDPaD. The GRiDPaD was equipped with a backlit ten-inch gray-scale screen, which accepted a modem/fax card, stylus input, 3-hour battery life, an interior floppy drive, and it operated on MS-DOS.1990s: the PDAs developmentIn spite of the GRiDPad launch at the termination of the à ¢Ã¢â€š ¬Ã‹Å"80s, the ensuing years did not generate a flow of the same tablets accessible to the populace from other makers. Though various firms began creating their own kinds of portable PC devices, what evidenced most of the à ¢Ã¢â€š ¬Ã‹Å"90s was the evolution of the personal digital assistant (PDA) market (Hendrik, Gove Webb, 2012; Phillips, 2008; Casady, 2011). This era did not openly shape the evolution of tablet Computers, but rather saw the development of its lesser cousin, the personal digital assistant (Hendrik, Gove Webb, 2012).The era began with a rivalry among corporations upon which of their OS would take over th e market. GO Company, which established the PenPoint operating system, was later purchased by ATT. This OS ran the ATT EOà ¢Ã¢â€š ¬s Personal Communicator. Introduced in 1993, PDA device by ATT could email and send fax, and it was sold to business managers with an unrestricted ATT subscription. Alongside a $2,500 value tag, the technology had less public appeal and was stopped just a year following its establishment (Smart, 2012). Microsoft similarly created its own operating system for PDAs, viewing the PenPoint operating as a competition to their Windows-driven Computers. The company developed Pen Extensions for 3.1 Windows and introduced it as Pen Computing Windows. Its features encompassed a platform attuned with the stylus-input and an on-screen keyboard. Furthermore, the OS similarly enabled devices operating on it to reply to the operatorà ¢Ã¢â€š ¬s han...